Comments on: Leopard (10.5), iWork, iLife… http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/ The antirumor site for all your Apple news, notes, rumors and analysis. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:28:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 By: Ethan http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-294 Ethan Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:21:09 +0000 http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-294 @John I agree completely. I think Apple's best chance is to start completely blank and allow their creativity and vision define iWork. It would be too easy for them to fudge on the little things, which I don't know if they would, but they do have to set priorities, so they might to a degree, "fudge". I know its a less tangible reason than others, but I really think they would feel more free to innovate if they continue with their blank slate. @John I agree completely. I think Apple’s best chance is to start completely blank and allow their creativity and vision define iWork. It would be too easy for them to fudge on the little things, which I don’t know if they would, but they do have to set priorities, so they might to a degree, “fudge”.

I know its a less tangible reason than others, but I really think they would feel more free to innovate if they continue with their blank slate.

]]> By: John C. Randolph http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-125 John C. Randolph Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:06:58 +0000 http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-125 I have to disagree with you re: open office. When you get right down to it, the thing is a Microsoft Office emulator, and when a project starts out with such a modest target, well, you get what you pay for. OO is fine and dandy for a hobby project, but it will never be worthwhile for Apple to spend any engineering resources on it. -jcr I have to disagree with you re: open office. When you get right down to it, the thing is a Microsoft Office emulator, and when a project starts out with such a modest target, well, you get what you pay for.

OO is fine and dandy for a hobby project, but it will never be worthwhile for Apple to spend any engineering resources on it.

-jcr

]]> By: Crabs http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-108 Crabs Wed, 24 Jan 2007 02:04:38 +0000 http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-108 yes, of course Leopard will look more like the iPhone, but you're forgetting one thing! why can't it WORK like the iPhone too? you talk about the interface, but you only talk about the visuals! What about a new Multi-Touch interface for everything Leopard?! yes, of course Leopard will look more like the iPhone, but you’re forgetting one thing! why can’t it WORK like the iPhone too? you talk about the interface, but you only talk about the visuals! What about a new Multi-Touch interface for everything Leopard?!

]]> By: applerecon http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-31 applerecon Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:47:48 +0000 http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-31 @alex - we completely agree, iWeb really could use an update...we'd like to be full-on Apple supporters and build Apple Recon in iWeb, but it just isn't quite there yet...hopefully this next version will get us there! @alex - we completely agree, iWeb really could use an update…we’d like to be full-on Apple supporters and build Apple Recon in iWeb, but it just isn’t quite there yet…hopefully this next version will get us there!

]]> By: alex http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-21 alex Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:02:03 +0000 http://applerecon.com/2007/01/13/leopard-105-iwork-ilife/#comment-21 iWeb is the only one I'm concerned because I use it and it's just too basic. I wish it would be more advanced. iWeb is the only one I’m concerned because I use it and it’s just too basic. I wish it would be more advanced.

]]>